fanatically interested in religion

A new study says that Atheists and Agnostics know more about religion than do religious people. Now, the study doesn’t say that the godless know more about, say Christianity than Christians, but about religion in general. It’s hypothesized that the reason for this is that most Agnostics and Atheists were religious at one time and that their choice to become nonbelievers was one they really studied and thought hard about, this includes studying what others believe.

I know my own godlessness came only after a thorough review of many religious beliefs, including those of Catholicism and Protestantism, the two religions in which I was raised. If I can toot my own horn and that of other Agnostics and Atheists, this seems both an intelligent and thoughtful way to look at the issue. After all, this is a choice which many consider to be of soul-saving importance.

This is exactly what bothers me about the conclusion of this study. It leads me to believe that religious people studied no other religions before they decided to adopt their one true faith. More than likely their parents indoctrinated them at a young age and they just continued on believing. This seems a bit odd when it comes to, like I said, a decision of soul-saving importance.

The study also shows that many don’t know some of the basic tenets of their own faith. Again, it doesn’t say that Jews know more about Islam than Muslims, but that Muslims may not know all that much about Islam. This doesn’t particularly surprise me in that many of the most fanatically religious seem to only know and really stick to certain tenets of their religion. For example, for some Catholics of a certain ilk it’s not important to know every one of the 10 Commandments but they’ll memorize every single psalm, stanza or verse in the bible that damns homosexuality (and they will endlessly spew them out whenever they get the chance.) Whoops, sorry about that. Assholes have been getting on my nerves during this election season.

Veering away from the results of this interesting study to my own personal babblings, I think it takes some balls to be fanatically religious. Why? Well in the first place, there isn’t a lot of fact/proof to back up religious beliefs. When questioned about their religion, the intelligent religious will say that it’s all a matter of faith and leave it at that because there is no 2+2=4 in religion. To argue anything else reminds me of the arguments of those with deep beliefs in most conspiracy theories when they are called on to defend themselves. For example, I would expect the same reasoning from someone defending their fanatical belief in UFO’s as I would from a fanatical Mormon practitioner.

The second reason I think it takes balls to be fanatically religious is the constant contradictions that they have to live with. For example, in the King James Bible, there are the straight forward crazy things like rules for stoning women who aren’t virgins on their wedding night (Deuteronomy 22: 13-21) contrasted with the commandment “Thou Shall Not Murder.” Come on, can I kill her or not? What about my neighbor who mows his lawn on the Sabbath? Can I punish him for not keeping it holy or will god do it later?

Then there are the contradictions the religious must deal with that aren’t so black and white. Can someone who follows the teachings of the bible support wars where people will be killed in their name? Can they vote for a politician who supports said war? Can they live in a country where their tax dollars go to buy bullets that will be used to kill others?

No doubt these are tough questions they must think about, and these are only some of the most obvious contradictions from only one religion.

Even as a godless heathen I find the topic of religion fascinating, and with examining this little slice of it even more so. I think a little more study is in order.